[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Music & Copyright (2 items)
From: digital-copyright Digest 20 May 2008 15:00:00 -0000 Issue
793
RIAA Setback: Making Music Available May Not Be Copyright
Infringement. By Thomas Claburn, InformationWeek, May 15, 2008.
http://tinyurl.com/6fpapn
"A district judge may order a new trial in a music file-sharing
suit that won record companies $222,000 for copyright
infringement. The act of making music available online may not be
a copyright violation after all. And if that's the case, Jammie
Thomas of Minnesota may not have to pay the $222,000 judgment won
by record companies last year, an amount Thomas' attorneys argue
is unconstitutionally excessive." ... "According to a Star
Tribune report, the judge's order said that "he may have made a
'manifest error of law' last October when he instructed a Duluth
jury that simply uploading songs to a music file-sharing network
could be considered illegal distribution, even in the absence of
proof that anyone received them."
****
(c)ollectanea Blog. Collected perspectives on copyright.
http://chaucer.umuc.edu/blogcip/collectanea/ -- Get the Feed
Blog: Royalty Logic Seeks To Prove Copyright Board
Unconstitutional. By Eliot Van Buskirk, WiredBlogNetwork, May 14,
2008. http://blog.wired.com/music/2008/05/disgruntled-web.html
"Just when record labels thought it was safe to start charging
webcasters on a per-listener, per-song basis, the US Copyright
Royalty Board that set the rates has been charged
unconstitutional in the Federal Court of Appeals."
Chuck Hamaker
Associate University Librarian Collections and Technical Services
Atkins Library
University of North Carolina Charlotte
Charlotte, NC 28223